Peer Review History: Phased Financing, Project Governance and Project Sustainability in Donor-funded Non-governmental Organisations: A Critical Desk Review of the Kenyan Evidence

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Olexandr Yemelyanov, Institute of Economics and Management, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine.

(2) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov,Kuban State Agrarian University, AND Kuban State Techno-logical University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) B.R.Kumar, Andhra Loyola College, India.

(2) Seyed Hossein Ahmadi Langari, Azad Islamic University , Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Padmika Herath, The University of Fiji, Sri Lanka.

(2) Ali khalaf Gatea, Sothern Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Abraham Kiruga, Catholic University Of Eastern Africa, Kenya.

(4) Abubakar Modibbo, Federal University Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria.

(5) Champa Bosu, Chouddagram Government College, Bangladesh.

(6) Chet Narayan Acharya, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

(7) Jenifer Richard, Rabindranath Tagore University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B.R. Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Seyed Hossein Ahmadi Langari, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Blockchains Adoption and Market Efficiency: Evidence from African Capital Markets

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ciurea Maria, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ram Ghadiyaram, JPMC, USA.

(2) Krishnamoorthi M, Kristu Jayanti University , India.

(3) Anisha Arora, Manipal University Jaipur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prity Khastgir, India.

(2) R.Ravichandran, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ram Ghadiyaram, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Krishnamoorthi M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anisha Arora, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unsteady Radiative MHD Flow of Jeffrey Fluid through a Porous Medium with Hall and Soret Effects in the Presence of Convective Boundary Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, Jinzhou 121013, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Himanshu Sharma, University Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Mahafujur Rahaman, Z. H. Sikder University of Science & Technology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Christian Walsh Benjamin, The Charutar Vidyamandal (CVM) University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Himanshu Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahafujur Rahaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Web-Based Phishing Detection in the Era of Explainable and Generative AI: A Critical Narrative Review of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Explainable AI and Large Language Models

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Shubhiodip Sasmal, USA.

(2) Florentina-Anica PINTEA, ”Tibiscus” University of Timisoara, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) N Dinesh Kumar, Vignan Institute of Technology and Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shubhiodip Sasmal, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Florentina-Anica PINTEA, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Commercial Nursery Systems in Nigerian Vegetable Production: A Critical Review of Agronomic Performance, Phytosanitary Function and Institutional Constraints

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Dushyant Dipakkumar Champaneri, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

(2) Radka Bozhinova, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kanchhi Maya Waiba, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dushyant Dipakkumar Champaneri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Radka Bozhinova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fractional-Order Temporal Dynamics of Cancer-Immune Interactions: Memory Effects in Tumour Growth, Immune Response, and Chemotherapy Pharmacokinetics

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Cutberto Romero-Melendez, Metropolitan Autonomous University, Mexico.

(2) Amin Gholami Davodi, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Iran.

(3) Madan Lal, M.J.P. Rohilkhand University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vinod Varghese, M.G. College, India.

(2) Mohammed Shehu, College Of Health Technology Minna, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cutberto Romero-Melendez, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amin Gholami Davodi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Madan Lal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gross Capital Formation and Economic Growth in Nigeria: Evidence from the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anan Suebsomran,King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Imran Khan, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, United Arab Emirates.

(2) Saudin Terzic, University “Vitez”, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

(3) Yohannis Bekele Kemiso, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Imran Khan, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saudin Terzic, Bosnia and Herzegovina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yohannis Bekele Kemiso, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: IMPACT OF NEW BUSINESS DENSITY ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA: EVIDENCE FROM THE AUTOREGRESSIVE DISTRIBUTED LAG (ARDL) APPROACH

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Monika Arora, Amity University Haryana, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Atiba Batul, Swami Vivekananda University, India.

(2) V. Darling Selvi, St. Xavier’s Catholic College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Atiba Batul, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. Darling Selvi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Empowering Women in Fisheries: A Critical Review of Roles, Structural Constraints and Pathways to Equitable Change

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Monika Arora, Amity University Haryana, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Porselvan.S, Tamil Nadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, India.

(2) Shambhu Prasad, Lalit Naryan Mithila University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ayşe Nur Aydin, Central Fisheries Research Institute,Türkiye.

(2) Ashraf Shahriar Suharto, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Porselvan. S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shambhu Prasad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quantifying Curricular Integration in Low-Cost Edge-AI Laboratory Instruction: A Formal Model and a Six-Week Pilot Evaluation in a Nigerian Computer Science Department

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Prathap Raghavan , University of Madras, USA.

(2) Mujiba Shaima, Monroe University , USA.

(3) Ashish Dibouliya, Rabindranath Tagore University Bhopal , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.86/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prathap Raghavan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mujiba Shaima, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ashish Dibouliya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA