Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nawar Sahib Khalil, Al-Iraqia University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Dharmasoth Rama Devi, Vignan Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, India.

(2) Shahriza Bin Shahrudin, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Arvind Raghav, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dharmasoth Rama Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahriza Bin Shahrudin, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Arvind Raghav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Wilson Bangun, Maranatha Christian University, Indonesia.

(2) Ukutegbe Samuel Oroghenemudiake, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wilson Bangun, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ukutegbe Samuel Oroghenemudiake, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hüseyin CÜCE, Giresun University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) M Shunmugasundaram, SRM Valliammai Engineering College, India.

(2) M.Suresh Kumar, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Mahavidyalaya, India.

(3) Prem Kumar Dara, Gambella University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M Shunmugasundaram, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M.Suresh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Prem Kumar Dara, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel Ahmed Soliman, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Saptarshi Mukherjee, Biozone Research Technologies Pvt Ltd, India.

(2) Bijendra Pal, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saptarshi Mukherjee, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bijendra Pal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel Ahmed Soliman, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Raagavalli K, Kuvempu University, India.

(2) Francisco Castillo Reyes, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raagavalli K, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Francisco Castillo Reyes, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Nihad Abdul-Lateef Ali Kadhim, AL -Qasim Green University , Iraq.

(2) Agussalim, MSN, Makassar Health Polytechnic, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nihad Abdul-Lateef Ali Kadhim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Agussalim, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Prasad Shridharrao Gangakhedkar, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Mirela Anamaria Jimborean, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(3) Ayad Jameel Jebur Alkhafaji, University of Kufa, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prasad Shridharrao Gangakhedkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mirela Anamaria Jimborean, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ayad Jameel Jebur Alkhafaji, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Kuban State Techno-logical University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaharia Ahmed, Qingdao University , China.

(2) Muhammad Amir Qureshi, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Pakistan.

(3) Gargee Bhattacharjee, National Institute of Fashion Technology, India.

(4) Avninder Kaur Dhillon , Master Tara Singh Memorial College for Women , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shaharia Ahmed, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Amir Qureshi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gargee Bhattacharjee, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Avninder Kaur Dhillon, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel Ahmed Soliman, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Aparna Gunjal, Dr. D.Y. Patil, Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.

(2) Eram Ayaz, Barkatullah University , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aparna Gunjal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eram Ayaz, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel Ahmed Soliman, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Bivek Chakma, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Udaya Kumar Addanki, Anurag University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bivek Chakma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Udaya Kumar Addanki, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA