Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Kenny Ardillah, Indonesia.

(2) Subrata Kumer Pal, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kenny Ardillah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subrata Kumer Pal, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sherin Ahmed Mohamed Sherif, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Saranya, Alagappa Institute of Management, Alagappa University, India.

(2) Amit Kumar Bardhan, K.K.S. Women’s College, Fakir Mohan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Saranya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Kumar Bardhan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Nur Inshirah Naqiah Ismail, Nilai University, Malaysia.

(2) Said Agoujil, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nur Inshirah Naqiah Ismail, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Said Agoujil, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Silpa N, Shri Vishnu Engineering College for Women, India.

(2) Debajyoti Bora, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya Adarsha Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Silpa N, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Debajyoti Bora, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mayur Anil Dande, Shri Sant Gajanan Maharaj College of Engineering, India.

(2) Ruchi Tyagi, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.

(3) Chinenye Lilian Okafor, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.44/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mayur Anil Dande, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ruchi Tyagi, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Chinenye Lilian Okafor, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Talha Riaz, College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, China.

(2) Arjun Lal Ola, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Talha Riaz, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Arjun Lal Ola, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sherin Ahmed Mohamed Sherif, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Usman, Abban Gafai Education Resource Centre, Nigeria.

(2) Rimamsitse Nuhu, College of Agriculture, Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Usman, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rimamsitse Nuhu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, China

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Sarkar, Gour Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Muhammad Din, Thammasat University, Thailand.

(3) Rashmi Sharma, GNA University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Din, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rashmi Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Medhat A. M. Elkelawy, Tanta University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Maheshkumar Maharudrappa, Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College, Bidar, India.

(2) Ezeala George, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.

(3) Hakeem Hammood Flayyih, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maheshkumar Maharudrappa, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ezeala George, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hakeem Hammood Flayyih, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Illiyas Maqbool, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Shashi Agarwal, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Illiyas Maqbool, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shashi Agarwal, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA