Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdulrezzak Alivi, Saudi Arabia .

(2) George Albert Toma, Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology, Syrian Arab Republic.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdulrezzak Alivi, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (George Albert Toma, Syrian Arab Republic) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Zeeshan Asghar, College of Humanities and Sciences Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia.

(2) M. Padma Devi, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zeeshan Asghar, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Padma Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

(2) Dr. Anan Suebsomran, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Ephraim M. Villacrusi, Philippine Normal University, Philippines.

(2) Namita Gupta, Arya Mahila PG College , India.

(3) James Tetteh Ademtsu, Takoradi Technical Universit, Ghana.

(4) Gargee Bhattacharjee, National Institute of Fashion Technolog, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khalifa Ahmed Muiz, University of the Punjab, Pakistan.

(2) Ladan Abouali, University of Waikato (China campus), China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ephraim M. Villacrusi, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Namita Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (James Tetteh Ademtsu, Ghana) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Gargee Bhattacharjee, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Muskan Bhullar, Khalsa College Amritsar, Guru Nanak Dev University, India.

(2) Ram Naresh, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muskan Bhullar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ram Naresh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Nurul Raihen, University of Toledo, USA.

(2) M. Rameshkumar, P. A. College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(3) S. Dhilshath, Sri Sairam Engineering College, India.

(4) Sonali Saini Sahu, JH Govt. PG College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mathil Kamil Thamer, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage7.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nurul Raihen, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Rameshkumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Dhilshath, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sonali Saini Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Haleema Bibi, Pakistan.

(2) Aasheesh Kumar , University of Allahabad , India .

(3) Sri Rahayu Surtiningtyas, Politeknik Penerbangan Surabaya, Indonesia.

(4) Celestine Ndanu Mwaniki, The Catholic University of Eastern Africa , Kenya .

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aderemi Moses Adewale, Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Education Owerri, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.125/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haleema Bibi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aasheesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sri Rahayu Surtiningtyas, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Celestine Ndanu Mwaniki, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Mohan, RGPV, BHOPAL, India.

(2) T.Thirunavukkarasu, KIT-Kalaignarkarunanidhi Institute of Technology, India.

(3) M.B.Suvarchala, Akkineni Nageswara Rao College, India.

(4) Ugochukwu Onwudebelu, Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravi Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T.Thirunavukkarasu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M.B.Suvarchala, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ugochukwu Onwudebelu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdulmumin Garba Budah, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Nigeria.

(2) Karthika Krishnakumar A, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Henrietta Addai, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(2) Vikas Vatsa, India.

(3) Wheib Kusay A., Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdulmumin Garba Budah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karthika Krishnakumar A,India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xi-Lan Liu, Qinghai Nationalities University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Venkat P. Patil , Smt. Indira Gandhi college of Engineering, India.

(2) Samuel King Opoku, Kumasi Technical University, Ghana.

(3) Shiladhar Pawar, University of Horticultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Carlos Henrique Tognon, Federal University of Triângulo, Brazil.

(2) E Keshava Reddy, JNTUA College of Engineering Anantapur, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Venkat P. Patil, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samuel King Opoku, Ghana) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shiladhar Pawar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Pedro Saúl Castillo Carrillo, Universidad Nacional de Tumbes, Perú.

(2) Abdelbasit Mohammed Ibrahim Hussein, Alzaeim Alazhari University, Sudan.

(3) Lalit Gupta , Janta College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pritesh Ramanlal Gugale, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pedro Saúl Castillo Carrillo, Perú) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdelbasit Mohammed Ibrahim Hussein, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lalit Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA