Peer Review History: Examining the Role of Behavioural Profiling and Forensic Accounting Techniques in Fraud Engagement Processing with the Special Reference Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa , University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Sangale Rakhi P., MIT Art, Design & Technology University, India.

(2) Surabhi R, Visvesvaraya Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anupam Verma, Government P.G. College Musafirkhana, India.

(2) Toba O. Abiloro, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(3) Yasmin Begum Nadaf, Rani Channamma University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sangale Rakhi P., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Surabhi R, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Managing Sweet Potato Weevil (Cylas puncticollis) and Enhancing Tuber Yield through Legume-forage Intercropping in Southern Ethiopia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Dharna Bisen, Jawaharlal Nehru Agriculture University , India.

(2) Gyan Prakash Morya, Vital Biotech Research & Training Institute, India.

(3) Sai Thilak K., S. D. Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prajapati Anandkumar Rajubhai, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dharna Bisen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gyan Prakash Morya, India ) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sai Thilak K., India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: INDICES OF LINE GRAPH OF R(G)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Atefeh Hasan-Zadeh, University of Tehran, Iran.

(2) Rasul Rasuli, Payame Noor University (PNU), Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Atefeh Hasan-Zadeh, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rasul Rasuli, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Internal Control Constraints and Performance of Revenue Collection in Marsabit County

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayapere Pere, Federal University of Uyo Akwa-Ibom State Uyo Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Collin Chikwira, University of South Africa, South Africa.

(3) Tale Geddafa, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

(4) Omid Farhad Touski , Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ayapere Pere, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Collin Chikwira, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tale Geddafa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Omid Farhad Touski , Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_1_v1| File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_4_v1| File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT AND TAX COMPLIANCE IN NIGERIAN INFORMAL SECTOR

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia.

(2) Dr. Sherin Ahmed Mohamed Sherif, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sahibpreet Singh, Guru Nanak Dev University, India.

(2) Walter Nhundum, Zimbabwe Open University, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sahibpreet Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Walter Nhundum, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Transformative Geometric Framework for Dihedral Groups: The Symmetry Density Index in Three-Dimensional Space

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sheng Zhang, Bohai University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Adrian Lipa, United Kingdom.

(2) Brett Teeple, University of Calgary, Canada.

(3) Rajdip Palit, Military College of Telecommunication and Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammed Bello, Federal University of Kashere, Nigeria.

(2) Tahir Manzoor, J.B. Institute of Engineering & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adrian Lipa, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Brett Teeple, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajdip Palit, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Deferred Taxation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Examining the Firm-Level Determinants in the Manufacturing Sector

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sams Uddin Ahmed, BRAC University, Bangladesh.

(2) Adetola Raman, The Oke-Ogun Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sams Uddin Ahmed, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adetola Raman, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM: A CASE STUDY OF THE UDUAGHAN BUS SCHEME IN DELTA STATE NIGERIA

Editor(s):

(1)Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1)Amatullah Abdullah, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria.

(2)ABHINANDA CHATTERJEE, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, INDIA.

(3) Raj Malhotra, Tezpur University Assam, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Elias M. Choueiri, USA.

(2) Osuji, Joshua Nwachukwu, Southern Delta University, Nigeria.

(3) P.Venkaiah Babu, Acharya Institute of Graduate Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amatullah Abdullah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (ABHINANDA CHATTERJEE, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Raj Malhotra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Anti-malarial Potential of Gmelina arborea in Suppressive and Established Infection Study in Mice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M. University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Gunasekar Manoharan, New Jersey Bio Science Centre, USA.

(2) Kuldeep Vinchurkar, Savitribai Phule Pune University (SPPU, Pune), India.

(3) Bindiya Barsola, Shoolini University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ramana Hechhu, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Technology, Malla Reddy Vishwavidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gunasekar Manoharan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kuldeep Vinchurkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bindiya Barsola, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Contractor Capacity and Inffrastructure Project Performance: Evidence from Road Construction Projects in Nairobi City County, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rakesh Verma, AKTU Lucknow University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gaston Ngochembo, De Montfort University, UK.

(2) Fiza Fathima, United Arab Emirates University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gaston Ngochembo, UK) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fiza Fathima, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA